James Morris <jmorr****@namei*****> wrote: > > Add calls to path-based security hooks into CacheFiles as, unlike > > inode-based security, these aren't implicit in the vfs_mkdir() and similar > > calls. > > Adding fsdevel for further review - cachefiles is essentially part of the > vfs, right ? It certainly makes good use of the VFS interfaces, so I suppose in that sense, yes. David
TOMOYO
Fork