On Tuesday 17 Aug 2010 03:13:30 Tetsuo Handa wrote: > Although many distributions started to enable multiple LSM modules, > Fedora will not enable LSM modules other than SELinux. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542986 Fedora is a RHEL testing ground. Features in Fedora eventually land up into RHEL. But, as you mentioned in the bug report, just enabling additional LSMs shouldn't have been rejected. Perhaps the charter for Fedora is to have lesser choices, support 1 feature and support it good. I had a similar experience. I think they should not follow this path. What they could do is something like what Debian/Ubuntu does. Add most features, support some. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://lists.osdn.me/mailman/archives/tomoyo-users-en/attachments/20100817/826db822/attachment.sig>
TOMOYO
Fork