Jamie Nguyen
jamie****@tomoy*****
Mon Feb 14 08:17:05 JST 2011
Tetsuo Handa wrote: > Jamie Nguyen wrote: >> I'm not sure what you mean? I never use Tab during navigation on a web >> page, but I'm guessing that you use Tab to cycle through links and >> would prefer that the pictures were not selected. > > Right. I think links are not needed unless they are connected to other > pages/pictures. If readers need to view pictures in original size, they can > choose "view image only" from the mouse's popup menu. > >> The reason I made the pictures link is because I scaled down the >> pictures when fitting in with text. The link allows the reader to see >> the full-size image if the scaled down picture is too small. I prefer >> the pictures not to be too big so that there isn't too much vertical >> scrolling and the text isn't broken up too much. Do you think any of >> the pictures are too small to read? If not, then the links could be >> removed. > > I think these pictures are large enough to read. OK, then I will remove image links where they are not appropriate. >> If repositories are ready to be set up then that would be good, but >> I'm fine with whatever you prefer. > > OK. I'll create directories for repositories. Older versions of apt do not > accept HTTP 301/302 responses. Thus, currently I'm asking users to add > http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.jp/tomoyo/$ReleaseID/ (rather than > http://tomoyo.sourceforge.jp/repos/$DistroName/ ) to /etc/apt/sources.list > so that users can download without bandwidth limitation (tomoyo.sourceforge.jp > is limited at 150KB/s whereas osdn.dl.sourceforge.jp is not limited). > > Newer versions of apt seem to accept HTTP 301/302 responses (like yum). > Do you think it is acceptable for users using older versions of apt to be > limited speed so that users can use $DistroName by using a CGI program > that shadows HTTP 301/302 responses installed on tomoyo.sourceforge.jp ? I suppose that depends on how many users you think there are using versions of apt that do not accept HTTP 301/302. From what I can see, apt supports it from version 7.20, so it looks like only Ubuntu 6.06/8.04 use older versions of apt out of the distributions that you provide binary packages for that haven't reached end of life. Do you have statistics?
TOMOYO
Fork