Fujimoto Hisa
hisa****@fobj*****
Wed Oct 25 03:07:28 JST 2006
On 2006/10/24, at 23:36, kimura wataru wrote: > Hi, > > The keyword "Revision" of subversion means latest revision of the > file changed. > > [EN] http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/ > svn.advanced.props.html#svn.advanced.props.special.keywords > [JA] http://subversion.bluegate.org/doc/ > ch07s02.html#svn.advanced.props.special.keywords > > I think current behavior of the "VERSION" file is not so bad. A > committer have to modify the file before release, then the value > of "Revision" will be refreshed automatically. It's useful to specify the revision what a loaded rubycocoa was built from. the way should be as possible as automatic both build-time and run-time. currently, for example, we have no way to specify it about apple-unstabe. (by Japanese) ロードしたバイナリがどのリビジョンから作られたものなのか確実に特 定する方法が欲しい。たとえば、apple-unstableは、ブランチし たあと誰もVERSIONを変更してないから簡単に識別する方法がな い、というようなところはなるべく自動化したいという気がします。も ちろん、VERSIONのRevsionキーワードをそのまま使っても かなり改善されますが、trunkやapple-unstable などの全 体のRevision(≒その範囲内で最後に変更されたファイルの Revision?)を反映する方法はないかな、ということです。 -- hisa > On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 10:38:51 +0900, Fujimoto Hisa wrote: >> I've implemented a constant OSX::RUBYCOCOA_SVN_REVISION. But it's not >> good implementation. >> >> This constant means the running RubyCocoa framework was build which >> revision of the subversion repository. But I'm not friendly >> subversion yet. the implementation is not good. revision number of >> the file 'VERSION' set as the value of the constant, it's not my >> mean. the value should be set as the revision number for the all >> source files. >> > > > -- > kimura wataru > _______________________________________________ > Rubycocoa-devel mailing list > Rubyc****@lists***** > http://lists.sourceforge.jp/mailman/listinfo/rubycocoa-devel
