kimura wataru
kimur****@i*****
Fri Mar 24 18:48:22 JST 2006
Hi, I wrote simple tests for [Rubycocoa-devel 195]. I cannnot decide to use OCUnit and otest tests of Objective-C side. Sat, Feb 11, 2006 11:17:15 AM, Jonathan Paisley wrote: >Hi, > >I've been playing with a patch that ensures that RBObject instances >created for Ruby objects are unique, rather than creating a new >RBObject each time a Ruby object is passed through the bridge. > >I had initially hoped this might make it easier to use an >NSOutlineView with non-NSObject-derived Ruby objects, but because >NSOutlineView doesn't retain the items this doesn't really work. > >In any case, I think it's nice to have a 1-1 mapping between Ruby >objects and RBObject. Perhaps it might be worth doing the same for >ObjCID instances too (using another hash table to map from 'id' to >VALUE). > >I've included the current patch below. If you think it's worth >pursuing further, I'll add test cases etc. If not, I'll keep the >patch around in case it becomes useful in the future. > >Cheers, >Jonathan > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: test_devel195.diff Type: application/octet-stream Size: 3111 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.sourceforge.jp/mailman/archives/rubycocoa-devel/attachments/20060324/df78eb66/attachment.obj
