Okuyama
okymm****@gmail*****
2013年 1月 8日 (火) 00:01:33 JST
Dear Mr. Fujii, This is Okuyama. Thanks for reviewing my patch files. I read your E-mail. In your E-mail, I think there is a problem in the source code that you suggested. You suggested new source code: 742 int InputParser::ParseConditionsCIS(vector<string>* inputTerms, int parseIndex) const{ 743 Parameters::GetInstance()->SetRequiresCIS(true); 744 parseIndex++; . . . . 827 // unpaired electron population 828 if((*inputTerms)[parseIndex].compare(this->stringCISUnpairedPop) == 0){ 829 if((*inputTerms)[parseIndex+1].compare(this->stringYES) == 0){ 830 Parameters::GetInstance()->SetRequiresUnpairedPopCIS(true); 831 } 832 else{ 833 Parameters::GetInstance()->SetRequiresUnpairedPopCIS(false); 834 } 835 parseIndex++; 836 } 837 parseIndex++; 838 } 839 return parseIndex; 840 } I implement the above source code into my source code and run the implemented source code in my PC. In CIS input, the following input is OK: unpaired_electron_population yes or unpaired_electron_population no However, the calculation stops abnormaly (segmentation fault) when the following input: unpaired_electron_population Now, I'm investigating the problem. I may have any time to solve this problem since I can't solve the problem.... I think I'd like to have a chance to talk with you by mobile phone etc. Best regards. Okuyama On 2013年01月06日 02:55, Mikiya Fujii wrote: > Dear Okuyama, > > Thanks for your patches. I had reviewed them. > > *** > Your coding-grammar and -style are quite fine! > But, I ask you to fix only one modification about input control: > (1) UEP should be set as "unpaired_electron_population yes" in CIS-directive, > that is, the following input obeys the MolDS's input style. > > CIS > .... > mulliken m > mulliken n > unpaired_electron_population yes > .... > END > > The corresponding code in the InputParser.cpp (r1234 which your 2 > patches and my modification had been applied to) is written as > > 742 int InputParser::ParseConditionsCIS(vector<string>* > inputTerms, int parseIndex) const{ > 743 Parameters::GetInstance()->SetRequiresCIS(true); > 744 parseIndex++; > . > . > . > . > 827 // unpaired electron population > 828 if((*inputTerms)[parseIndex].compare(this->stringCISUnpairedPop) > == 0){ > 829 if((*inputTerms)[parseIndex+1].compare(this->stringYES) == 0){ > 830 Parameters::GetInstance()->SetRequiresUnpairedPopCIS(true); > 831 } > 832 else{ > 833 Parameters::GetInstance()->SetRequiresUnpairedPopCIS(false); > 834 } > 835 parseIndex++; > 836 } > 837 parseIndex++; > 838 } > 839 return parseIndex; > 840 } > > With integration of the (1) to your second patch "add_opt_ctrl.patch", > please commit your code to the trunk. > > > *** > Besides, I ask you to do two more tasks about this ticket. > [1] Update test input and output files in the molds/trunk/test for the UEP. > I think that updating of only "c2h6_pm3_directCIS_singlet.in" and > "c2h6_pm3_directCIS_singlet.dat" is enough. > [2] Update documents (molds/trunk/doc/README.txt) to use UEP. > Explanation of the UEP option should be written in the > <CIS>-paragraph of the README.txt. > > Of course, please commit [1] and [2] too. > > > Please ask me if you have any question. > My best, > Mikiya > > *************************************** > Mikiya Fujii, Ph.D. > > Yamashita & Ushiyama Laboratory, > Department of Chemical System Engineering, > Faculty of Engineering, > The University of Tokyo. > > tel&fax: +81-3-5841-7286 > email: fujii****@tcl***** > HP: http://www.tcl.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/ > *************************************** > > > 2013/1/4 Okuyama <okymm****@gmail*****>: >> Dear colleagues >> >> This is Okuyama. >> >> I send patch files to impliment the unpaired electron population (UEP) >> and the input control to this mailing list. >> The patch files are the following files: >> *calc_uep_without_opt_ctrl.patch >> *add_opt_ctrl.patch >> >> calc_uep_without_opt_ctrl.patch adds source code to be available the >> unpaired electron population. >> By appling this patch file, it's possible to calculate the unpaired >> electron population of excited states on each single atom in molecule. >> Upto this implimentation, you can calculate the unpaired electron >> population of nth-excited states >> by adding the follwing input: >> CIS >> mulliken n >> END >> Next, the file, add_opt_ctrl.patch adds the input control of the >> unpaired electron population. >> The input control executes the calculation of the UEP >> when there is a keyword, 'unpaired_electron_population' in the CIS input. >> >> *Procedure to apply the patch files to the MolDS >> Revision of the Molds is 1234 >> In a directory, trunk, >> 1. patch -p0 < calc_uep_without_opt_ctrl.patch >> 2. patch -p2 < add_opt_ctrl.patch >> >> *How to use the UEP calculation >> Example) Calculation of the UEP of the m and n-th excited states >> CIS >> .... >> mulliken m >> mulliken n >> unpaired_electron_population >> .... >> END >> >> I have made sure the following terms: >> * There are not segmentation fault and abort by executing all the >> test inputs. >> * The MolDS.out is created by executing make depend INTEL=64 && >> make INTEL=64 >> * For all the test inputs including CIS keyword, I added the >> follwing keyword: >> CIS >> .... >> mulliken 2 >> mulliken 3 >> unpaired_electron_population >> ... >> END >> Under above condition, I make sure that there is no segmentation >> fault. >> >> At last, in this implimentation, it will not calculate the UEP at the >> ground state. >> The reason why the UEP at the ground state is zero and, therefore this >> calculation is nonsense. >> >> Best regards. >> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> テキスト形式以外の添付ファイルを保管しました... >> ファイル名: calc_uep_without_opt_ctrl.patch >> 型: text/x-patch >> サイズ: 8604 バイト >> 説明: 無し >> Download >> -------------- next part -------------- >> テキスト形式以外の添付ファイルを保管しました... >> ファイル名: add_opt_ctrl.patch >> 型: text/x-patch >> サイズ: 4357 バイト >> 説明: 無し >> URL: http://lists.sourceforge.jp/mailman/archives/molds-dev/attachments/20130104/ce956b15/attachment-0001.bin >> _______________________________________________ >> MolDS-dev mailing list >> MolDS****@lists***** >> http://lists.sourceforge.jp/mailman/listinfo/molds-dev